Characterization of in-field additively manufactured polymer composites – hot and dusty environment
About the publication
ISBN
9788246430492
Size
3.6 MB
Language
English
As part of the European Defence Agency (EDA) Operational Budget (OB) study “Additive
Manufacturing Feasibility Study & Technology Demonstration” (EDA contract no.
16.ESI.OP.144), in-field 3D printing of objects, i.e. using additive manufacturing, has been
demonstrated. The two contractors are Fundación Prodintec (Spain) and MBDA (France).
A (self-sustained) container, containing different printers, as well as tools for design, pre- and
post-processing of the printed objects has been established and transported (on land) to an air
base in Zaragoza, Spain. Moreover, the container has been put onto a transport aircraft,
airborne, and finally brought back to the same air base. The demonstration aims to show
military personnel, in particular, the possibilities and current capabilities of in-field production of
spare parts and objects using additive manufacturing (AM). A more detailed presentation of the
project and its different strands (state of the art, demonstration and AM exhibition/conference),
including more details about the experiences from the demonstration, as well as
recommendations for further research and development within this area, can be found in the
reports from the project.
Part of the AM demonstration is related to the material properties of the objects when printed
outside the regular (and stationary) factory or workshop. The printing conditions in field, such as
temperature, humidity and sand/dust/particles will typically be different from factory/workshop
conditions, and may not be possible to control or set. Such factors may influence the quality and
properties of the printed objects, which will influence on the object’s performance and area of
use.
In this study performed by FFI, which supported the work done in the current EDA study on AM,
the mechanical properties of standardized test specimens manufactured in the workshop/factory
and in field have been characterized. In total, eight types of test specimens were produced by
Prodintec. Four types of standardized test specimens were produced at Prodintec facilities in
May 2017 in factory/workshop conditions. The same four types of test specimens were printed
in the container in field during the exercise “European Advanced Airlift Tactics Training Course
for 2017” (EAATTC17-3) in Zaragoza, Spain, in June 2017.
As an overall conclusion, based on the test results from this study, no significant reduction or
change in mechanical properties are experienced for the objects printed in field compared to
those printed in more controlled workshop/factory conditions. It should, however, be noted that
the produced specimens are not fully dense; the specimens have a cell-like internal structure.
As the real cross-sectional area of the fracture surface is challenging to measure, the crosssectional
area of a dense specimen is applied in the calculations. Again, as a result of this, the
obtained parameter values included in the study for the specimen sets are much lower than
what is reported by the material manufacturer and in other studies. Still, a comparison of printing
under different conditions and locations, i.e. factory versus in-field, is relevant, and the overall
conclusion is still valid.