Impact of anthropogenic noise on the marine environment – status of knowledge and management
FFI-Report
2020
This publication is only available in Norwegian
About the publication
Report number
20/01015
ISBN
978-82-464-3262-5
Format
PDF-document
Size
1.7 MB
Language
Norwegian
Anthropogenic noise in the marine environment is sound generated by human activities that
comes in addition to natural sounds. Increased human activity has led to elevation of the noise
levels in our oceans over the last 2–3 decades. Almost all marine organisms use sound to
orientate, to find food, to avoid being eaten and to communicate. Elevated noise levels could
therefore lead to a degradation of the marine environment and habitats. An increased focus on
this, particularly the last 10–15 years, has resulted in research on how different noise sources
affect the marine ecosystem. The concern over the anthropogenic noise issue has also revealed
a need for regulation of noise pollution. EU and US noise management measures are more
advanced than in Norway, as there is currently no overall Norwegian plan for how noise
pollution should be regulated.
This report summarizes the knowledge on how anthropogenic noise affects the marine
environment. We also summarize the status of how the science community interacts with the
regulating authorities, and we discuss new technological trends in underwater acoustics that
might change the soundscape in the future. The contents of the chapters are summarized
below.
Direct injury to marine mammals: Powerful noise sources like seismic air guns, naval sonar and
detonations can cause direct injury to marine mammals. The hearing organ is particularly
vulnerable. However, hearing impairment resulting from noise exposure will be limited to the
area very close to the source. Risk of hearing impairment depends on source level, frequency
content of the sound, and hearing ability of the exposed species. For a particular noise source
and species, both the maximum sound pressure level and the accumulated sound exposure
level (acoustic energy) are important to consider. Hearing specialists that can hear high
frequency sounds, like porpoises and dolphins, seem to be the species with the lowest
threshold values for hearing impairment.
Direct injury to fish: Injuries can occur if fish are close to a powerful sound source. Detonations
have the greatest potential to cause injuries but are normally spread out in time and space.
Hearing damage in fish is temporary, but injuries to the swim bladder or internal organ could be
fatal. Injuries due to sound is unlikely to have any consequences at the population level.
Behavioral responses of marine mammals: Behavioral responses to sound in marine mammals
are well documented. However, the studies on sonar effects outnumber the studies on seismic
effects despite the fact that seismic activity is much more common in Norwegian waters. The
threshold of response and severity of responses varies between species and the biological
context. Beaked whales, porpoises, minke whales and killer whales are relatively responsive
species, whereas humpback whale, pilot whales and sperm whales are less responsive species.
Typical responses are avoidance of the exposed area, or alteration or interruption of biological
activities such as feeding, nursing, resting or communication. We have limited knowledge of
how such individual responses might accumulate to cause impacts at population levels, but it
cannot be excluded that use of navy sonar or seismic air guns can lead to population-level effects. This will depend on the extent of the exposure, and on where and when such noise
sources are used in relation to the density of and the biological context of sensitive species.
Behavioral responses of fish: Most sources of human-induced underwater noise are within the
frequency range where fish have optimal hearing. Noise, and in particular continuous noise, can
affect behaviors such as feeding, reproduction and antipredator behavior, which could lead to
population-level effects. There is, however, a need for more research to quantify such
population-level effects.
Effect on seabirds: The knowledge about effects of noise on seabirds is limited, but such effects
cannot be excluded. Since many seabirds are red-listed species, the level of knowledge should
be increased. Underwater noise might affect the ability of diving birds to hunt for prey and avoid
predators. Noise (e.g. seismic) might also effect the behavior of the prey. Behavioral responses
of the birds or their prey might increase the cost of feeding, and ultimately effect nesting
success.
Effects on invertebrates: There is limited knowledge on the effects of noise on invertebrates, but
existing studies suggest that noise can affect activity and hearing. It is unclear which levels of
noise are required to cause physical damage.
Technological trends in underwater acoustics: New technologies using underwater acoustics
are constantly being developed. Many of the new methods for using air guns, acoustic vibrators
and continuous sonars have lower peak pressure than conventional methods, but the
accumulated energy is often the same. Energy is spread out over time to create a more or less
continuous sound. This results in lower sound levels affecting a smaller area, but more
continuous noise might increase masking of acoustic information for animals in the exposed
area. More research is needed on continuous sound sources.
Management advice on the use of seismic sources: Before a seismic survey can be executed in
Norwegian waters, a notification has to be sent to the Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. The
Institute of Marine Research (IMR) and the Fishery Directorate (FD) are asked to give advice on
potential impact of the planned seismic survey on the marine ecosystem and on potential impact
on fisheries, respectively. The Office of the Auditor General of Norway recently published a
report pointing to the need for the environmental authorities to have a stronger role in regulating
seismic explorations, and that management of noise should be more knowledge-based. So far,
Norwegian authorities have mostly focused on the potential impact of seismic exploration on
fisheries, and environmental concerns, including impact on marine mammals, have been largely
ignored. The seismic activity in Norwegian waters is still high, and have moved further north to
areas with higher density of marine species. New species will therefore be exposed to seismic
exploration, and habitats where biological activities are highly seasonal will be exposed. Seismic
noise is an additional stressor on top of climate change and other anthropogenic disturbances.
Management advice on sonar use: The Norwegian Navy has implemented instructions for use
of active sonar in Norwegian waters based on research and advice from the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI). The instructions are to be followed by all Norwegian and foreign
naval ships operating in Norwegian waters. A decision-aid tool SONATE has been developed to
assist the Navy in planning and execution of sonar exercises to minimize risk to the
environment. However, there is no regulation of the use of fishery sonars or sonars used for
research purposes in Norway.
Management advice on underwater detonations: No clear procedure for permitting and risk
assessment is established for underwater detonations. Detonations happen at sea when war
remnants and dumped munition are demolished, during construction work or as part of naval
exercises. Both FFI and IMR contribute with advice to Norwegian regulating authorities on
matters related to detonations close to or under the sea. Contrary to the procedures established
to give scientific advice on the use of naval sonar and seismic, the advisory work is much more
random and ad hoc when it comes to detonations.
Summary and recommendations: The last chapter of the report summarizes the current status
of knowledge and based on this our recommendations regarding regulatory actions, as well as
research needs that will make the management of underwater noise more knowledge-based in
the future.