Efficient materiel procurements in the Norwegian Armed Forces – is the share of off-the-shelf procurements increasing?
FFI-Report
2021
This publication is only available in Norwegian
About the publication
Report number
20/03147
ISBN
978-82-464-3319-6
Format
PDF-document
Size
1.4 MB
Language
Norwegian
In 2019, the Norwegian Defence Materiel Agency (NDMA) delivered materiel to the Armed Forces
to a value of NOK 13.4 billion. Annual materiel investment payments are planned to increase in
the time period 2014–2024, with expected payments in the magnitude of NOK 15–20 billion per
year. Hence, materiel investments constitute a considerable share of the defence budget, and it
is important to ensure that resources are used efficiently.
Investment projects can procure materiel that is available in the market, modify existing materiel
to meet the demands and requirements of the Armed Forces, or develop new products. The
National defence industrial strategy points out that off-the-shelf procurements should be pursued
where this is the most cost-effective option. At the same time, existing products and technologies
may not always satisfy the demands and requirements of the Armed Forces. In addition, there
are areas in which it is important to maintain national control of competency, technology and
industry for instance to ensure political freedom of action and national sovereignty.
The Norwegian Ministry of Defence has defined an ambition to increase the share of off-the-shelf
procurements in both the current and the previous long-term plan, and the Norwegian Defence
Research Establishment (FFI) has previously identified a potential for economic savings by doing
so. In light of the ambition to increase the off-the-shelf share, this report seeks to investigate the
procurement form of projects in the investment plan from 2019. We study how the shares in 2019
compares to the shares in the investment plan from 2015, to evaluate in which direction the
investment portfolio is heading.
On an aggregate level the share of off-the-shelf projects, measured in terms of number of projects,
is slightly lower in 2019 than in 2015. Furthermore, it has been a reduction in the share of modified
off-the-shelf projects. This may indicate that it has become more difficult to modify existing
products and technology to meet the demands and requirements of the Armed Forces, so that
development of new materiel may be necessary. It may also indicate that there are more products
available in the market that satisfy the demands and requirements.
We find an increase in the share of development projects from 2015 to 2019. This is the case for
projects within all domains and both small and large projects. However, the increase is primarily
among projects with status planned or possible project, rather than among approved projects
currently in the procurement phase. Since the increase is caused by “planned development”, the
procurement form in these projects may change before entering into contracts. Furthermore, there
is room for changing the investment portfolio towards a larger off-the-shelf share by making
changes in projects where contracts have not yet been signed.
We identify some important areas for further studies. First, we point out how the method for
classifying projects may be developed further, including to agree upon common definitions.
Second, it may be relevant to study in greater detail the possibilities for procuring off-the-shelf
products in projects from different domains. Finally, we recommend repeating this analysis in 2–
4 years to evaluate the trends in a longer time perspective.