Happy days – social takeaways from 100 days of patrol duty during Arctic winter

In 2025, two patrols from the Long-Range Reconnaissance Squadron in Finnmark conducted a 100-day winter exercise, FAM100. This report examines social conditions and interpersonal relationships during the exercise. The dataset consists of semi-structured interviews with all 13 operators, analyzed using an exploratory, grounded theory-inspired approach in MAXQDA 24.
A key finding is that the operators largely experienced the exercise as positive, despite expecting significant mental and social strain. Following an initial adaptation phase, many developed a sense of flow, well-being, camaraderie, and humor, referred to as “Happy Days.” However, it became evident that this sense of well-being was linked to the safe framework and known end date of the exercise. It therefore does not fully reflect the realities of war.
Several factors contributed to effective collaboration: extensive preparation, selection and voluntariness; shared culture and training; and managed expectations and established ground rules. Collaboration was strongest with a clear framework with defined roles and tasks requiring contributions from the entire team. Mission command, characterized by clear intent and a high degree of autonomy within each individual’s area of expertise, proved particularly effective.
At the same time, the study identified several sources of strain. Sleep deprivation emerged as the single most critical factor, significantly affecting cognitive capacity, decision-making, and social tolerance. Additional stressors included physical wear and tear, skin problems, cold exposure, limited daylight, use of night vision devices, and persistent equipment challenges. Irritation primarily arose from minor issues, uneven workload distribution, and personality differences, amplified by prolonged close cohabitation.
Relational challenges were largely managed through strategies such as rest, temporary isolation, shielding from strain, and explicit conflict management. Two different feedback models—structured “hot wash” sessions and more selective, ongoing correction—were practiced in the two patrols, without one emerging as clearly superior. Effective management appears to depend on context, group dynamics, and individual maturity.
The study also identifies significant challenges related to equipment, logistics, and operational frameworks. Operators perceive the system as largely adapted to peacetime conditions, characterized by slow procurement processes and insufficiently adapted equipment. This affects both operational capability and motivation. Furthermore, a tension was observed between field-based risk understanding and the system-level need for control and safety.
In conclusion, the operators highlight the need for broader transformation within the Armed Forces from a peacetime mindset to a more realistic understanding of war. This includes faster and more flexible procurement processes, greater preparedness for casualties and ethical dilemmas, as well as strengthened medical support and operational adaptation to demanding environments. The study thus provides important insights for planning and execution of future long-duration operations.